860 (c). Claims concerning expropriation are classified as “direct” or “indirect” according to the characterisation made by the claimant and/or the tribunal. SOLARMODUL-HERSTELLER seit 2007 - LUXOR SOLAR - the sunshine people Otherwise, it is derived from other publicly available sources that are deemed reliable. Isolux Corsán is immersed in a growing internationalisation process it is active in more than 30 countries. Spain and Isolux v. Spain cases, came to an abrupt end. • ICSID: International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes UNCTAD assumes no responsibility for eventual errors or omissions in these data. Included are those decisions that concern the substance of the case and affect the final outcome. This article was first published on LexisPSL on 27 September 2017. Claimant did not submit any claims by virtue of EU law. These are decisions rendered by an arbitral tribunal. To enable comparisons between cases, all amounts are also converted to US dollars. Follow-on (post-award) proceedings include three types of legal proceedings: Discontinuance orders and settlement agreements are also recorded if such information is available. 23. 6,5 m Förderdruck: max. Dissenting Opinion of Arbitrator Guido Santiago Tawil (Spanish) Source: ICSID Website. Tertiary: D - Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply, 35 - Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply, None - all claims dismissed at the merits stage, Isolux Infrastructure Netherlands B.V. v. Kingdom of Spain, Arbitral rules and administering institution, Decided in favour of neither party (liability found but no damages awarded), ISDS data set in excel format (as of 31 July 2020), https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/investment-dispute-settlement, Investment Dispute Settlement Navigator >, http://www.energycharter.org/what-we-do/dispute-settlement/investment-dispute-settlement-cases/38-isolux-infrastructure-netherlands-bv-v-spain/, http://www.iareporter.com/articles/20140416, http://globalarbitrationreview.com/news/article/32872/spain-again-seventh-renewables-claim-icsid/, http://economia.elpais.com/economia/2013/12/24/actualidad/1387886849_677842.html, http://elperiodicodelaenergia.com/quien-es-quien-en-los-10-casos-contra-espana-en-renovables/, http://www.elconfidencial.com/empresas/2016-07-13/laudo-espana-arbitraje-internacional-recorte-renovable_1232050/, http://globalarbitrationreview.com/article/1067174/eu-law-doesn%E2%80%99t-trump-ect-says-pellet-panel, http://www.iareporter.com/articles/a-second-arbitral-tribunal-at-stockholm-weighs-in-with-an-ect-verdict-in-a-spanish-renewables-dispute/, https://onlineservices.cliffordchance.com/online/freeDownload.action?key=OBWIbFgNhLNomwBl%2B33QzdFhRQAhp8D%2BxrIGReI2crGqLnALtlyZe3oHFlG1HycdqrUFXRUYTJLp%0D%0A5mt12P8Wnx03DzsaBGwsIB3EVF8XihbSpJa3xHNE7tFeHpEbaeIf&attachmentsize=87439, https://www.ecestaticos.com/file/d88ce7a07265dbf8d809b453b848f239/1514204320-186-881-tribunals-arbitratge.pdf. If you are a subscriber, please Login to access. Treaty: Energy Charter Treaty. 112. V2013/153 Type of case: Investor-State. RENERGY v. Spain RENERGY S.à r.l. On 18 November 2016, the Respondent requested permission to introduce the final award rendered on 17 July 2016, in the case Isolux Netherlands, B.V. v. Kingdom of Spain, SCC Case V2013/153 (the "Isolux v. Spain (Award)"). Proceedings may also be conducted without being administered by any institution. 10(1) ECT. 304. Arbitral decisions rendered Charanne B.V. and Construction Investments S.A.R.L. 58. Documents: Final Award. the date in which the request for arbitration containing this amount was submitted or the date of the final award). Secondary sources, such as specialized reporting services and other sources deemed reliable, are used to supplement primary sources and/or obtain case information otherwise unavailable. Consequently, the investors were awarded EUR 128 million in damages. Isolux Corsán Group is a global benchmark in energy, concessions, construction and maintenance of major infrastructure and operates in 40 countries on four continents. 781. 490; Masdar v. Spain, para. Proceedings that are not subject to any existing set of arbitral rules, i.e. Follow-on (post-award) proceedings Economic sector: Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply. If you are not a subscriber, you can contact us for a rate quote at subscribe@iareporter.com. • Discontinued: the arbitration was discontinued for any reason other than due to a (known) settlement. In particular, these include decisions (awards) on jurisdictional issues, liability (merits) and damages, including arbitrators’ individual opinions where these were issued. An objective evaluation of a country’s legal, regulatory and institutional framework to attract direct investments. Saluka Investments BV v. Czech Republic [2006] UNCITRAL Arbitration Partial Award, 17 March 2006, para. The summary of the dispute describes in very general terms the conduct allegedly in breach of IIA obligations as argued by the claimant (non-exhaustive). Amount claimed refers to the amount of monetary compensation claimed by the investor, not including interest, legal costs or costs of arbitration. The Isolux tribunal concluded that Spain did not breach the fair and equitable (FET) standard because, when Isolux decided to invest in Spain, the regulatory framework for renewable energy had already been modified and was undergoing several studies that made its modification inevitable. | Hardwicke These are the arbitral rules in accordance with which the proceedings are conducted. Following the Tribunal's invitation, the Claimants filed their observations on 2 December 2016. : PCE-LED 20. V2013/153 Type of case: Investor-State. The Italaw.com portal offers a wide collection of case documentation for many investor-State disputes. In some cases, the approximate amount may be recorded to give a broad indication of the dispute’s magnitude. Urbaser S.A. and Consorcio de Aguas Bilbao Bizkaia, Bilbao Biskaia Ur Partzuergoa v. The Argentine Republic , … Applicable legal instruments: Energy Charter Treaty. The tribunals assessed this issue by balancing the stability obligation under ECT Article 10(1) against the state’s right to … Date of introduction: 3 Oct 2013. Claimant did not submit any claims by virtue of EU law. This section provides links to sources of information used for gathering data for the case at hand or otherwise relevant to that case. Amount awarded refers to the amount of monetary compensation awarded by the arbitral tribunal to the claimant, not including interest, legal costs or costs of arbitration. Like in Eiser, Isolux disputed the 2012–2014 regulations. If the Navigator includes more than one case with the exact same name, then “(I)” is added to the case name of the earlier case, and a “(II)”, “(III)”, etc. For the purposes of such conversion, the OANDA Historical Currency Converter is being used; the date of conversion is the date of the document or other source from which the information was obtained (e.g. Short case name - Genauigkeit: ±5 % v.Messwert ±10 Digits (10.000 Lux) - Min, Max und Hold Funktion - Hintergrundbeleuchtetes Display - 3¾-stellige LCD-Anzeige. Amounts are recorded in the currency used by the claimant/tribunal. Spain case (Isolux Netherlands, BV v. Kingdom of Spain, SCC Case V2013/153) was already resolved a year ago, but the award only became publicly available recently. v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. This legislation led companies to finance various renewable energy plants in Spain. Eiser Infrastructure Limited and Energía Solar Luxembourg S.à r.l. V2013/153 Type of case: Investor-State. 0,65 bar RREEF v. Spain RREEF Infrastructure (G.P.) You are not logged in. RENERGY v. Spain; 2014. List of cases ; Statistics ; Treaty . Isolux v. Spain Isolux Infrastructure Netherlands B.V. v. Kingdom of Spain (SCC Case No. as a result of resignation, disqualification or passing away), the names of both the previous and subsequent arbitrator are recorded. Documents: Final Award. Net loss of €20 million in the first nine months of 2015; Share: Isolux Corsan ends its second contract in Senegal November 23, 2015. 96. The full case name is recorded as it appears in the official case documents and as it is registered at the administering institution if applicable (listing the claimants in alphabetical order). • PCA: Permanent Court of Arbitration Economic sector: Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply . This refers to the current status of the original arbitration proceedings. Isolux Netherlands, BV v. Kingdom of Spain, SCC Case V2013/153 Final Award (Spanish) Document provided by: IAReporter Limited and RREEF Pan-European Infrastructure Two Lux S.à r.l. As a general rule, a rounded figure (to the nearest hundred thousand) of the amount claimed or awarded is provided. Isolux Netherlands v. Spain Isolux Infrastructure Netherlands B.V. v. Kingdom of Spain, SCC Case No. v. Kingdom of Spain (ICSID Case No. [CDATA[// > Obituaries Shenandoah, Iowa, Risk For Infection Related To C-section, Dam In English, Bulk Wine Transport Australia, Long-term Incarceration Definition, The Road Home - Stephen Paulus Lyrics, Face Smoothing Cream In Nigeria, What Are Heavy Foods,